The Justice Project
The Docket
North Carolina Supreme Court
Home / Decisions / State v. Jonathan Ray Lail
State v. Jonathan Ray Lail
Filed October 17, 2025

The vote

4–1
Per curiam
Divided
+2 in part
7 of 7 justices participating
Per curiam 4 justices Unsigned opinion issued for the Court as a whole
Concurring in part, dissenting in part 2 justices Joined part of the ruling, dissented from the rest
Dissent 1 justice Disagreed with the Court’s decision

Lineup parsed from the opinion and verified against the PDF.

Issue

Preservation of issues—exclusion of evidence—offer of proof made—ruling obtained

Summary

In a prosecution for multiple sexual offenses, defendant properly preserved for appellate review his argument that the trial court erroneously excluded a written statement by the victim–which could have been used to impeach the victim's credibility–where, as required by Appellate Rule 10(a)(1), defendant objected to the ruling by clearly stating the grounds for admitting the statement and made an offer of proof, after which the trial court expressly noted that the issue was preserved for review.

Summary from the North Carolina Reports digest (official subject index). Read the opinion →

The record

DecisionAffirmed
Docket166A24
CountyCatawba County